Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

九九视频精品全部免费播放-九九视频免费精品视频-九九视频在线观看视频6-九九视频这-九九线精品视频在线观看视频-九九影院

【dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary】HBO Max's 'Persona' shows personality quiz dystopia

When I was a teenager,dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary I applied for a job at an ice cream chain I ought not name for legal reasons. After filling in my online application, the chain’s website directed me to a series of multiple choice questions that seemed completely irrelevant to the job. I had to select “strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree” to prompts like “I tend to have a positive outlook on life” and thought the whole thing was weird as hell. I was never called in for an interview.

Later in my career, I worked as an online quiz editor. My job was to write, design, edit, and develop new formats of those super-clickable online personality quizzes that took over everyone’s Facebook news feed in the early 2010s. If you wanted to find out which Disney animal sidekick you were, I was the one deciding you were Mushu (you’re welcome). Writing those quizzes was part social engineering, part fortune telling, and part being a hungover 24-year-old with a deadline, but take it from someone who has seen the back end of that code: The results are meaningless.

I never expected to connect my failure to secure ice cream employment with my first online media job, but watching the HBO Max documentary Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Testsbrought them together in a terrifying comparison with real-world implications. Personaexamines the cultural phenomenon that is the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator and, to a lesser extent, the Big 5 Personality Test by tracking the historical origins of Myers-Briggs, the use of personality testing in hiring practices, and the potentially nefarious social uses of such assessments.

Personaexamines personality testing from several angles, each of which horrify me in different personal and professional ways. There are the Myers-Briggs YouTubers who take their four-letter personality type so seriously they stake their careers on it, the job seekers who take courses that teach them how to “pass” personality tests like the one I encountered as a teen, executives at testing companies that grin into the camera while defending the concept that only 16 kinds of people exist, and a fresh new hell every 15 minutes or so. If that sounds overwhelming, that’s because it is. Personatakes on a lot and only succeeds in making a point half the time.

SEE ALSO: 15 must-watch Netflix titles celebrating feminism and gender equality

The overarching idea behind this documentary is that these personality tests were created by flawed human beings to help individuals understand themselves better. Finding out you’re an INTP, high in Neuroticism, or a Mushu is fun and in the best case scenario may lead to some introspection. Unfortunately, the quiz editors of yesteryear picked up the wacky idea that personality quizzes were somehow definitive and scientific when applied to deciding who’s good at jobs. Now, there are entire corporate entities dedicated to selling personality quiz packages to ice cream franchises so they can screen out people who select anything other than “strongly agree” to awkward, personal inquiries.

Mashable Top Stories Stay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news. Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Some of the subjects ofPersona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Testargue that testing for personality in the hiring process is a loophole for discrimination. Mentally ill, neuroatypical, and culturally diverse applicants start such testing at a disadvantage, especially if the rubric for an “ideal” employee at a given company is based on the presumably healthy white men who designed the test. This is a good point. Where Personafails as a documentary is the follow-up to this assertion of discrimination.

One of the documentary’s pivotal moments is the inevitable milkshake ducking of Isabel Briggs Myers, one of the co-authors of the Myers-Briggs assessment.

Even thoughPersonaspends some time with companies that provide hiring tests, it doesn’t push them to interrogate their place in what the documentary presents as an outwardly discriminatory system. When a high-ranking employee at a testing company holds the party line that personality testing is designed to slot people into jobs that suit their “natural” tendencies, the implication is that the tests maximize staff happiness by making sure the people hired will love their job. At no point are these companies asked about a hypothetical unemployed person who doesn’t need to find personal fulfillment in corporate sales but would like to have a salary and healthcare regardless. Those unasked questions don’t exactly leave the subjects off the hook, but they do result in Personafeeling like an incomplete investigation.

One of the documentary’s pivotal moments is the inevitable milkshake ducking of Isabel Briggs Myers, one of the co-authors of the Myers-Briggs assessment. Long story short: She was a white supremacist who believed people with lower IQs were incapable of self-perception and designed her first tests based on the idea that men and women have different natural aptitudes. That triple punch of racism, ableism, and sexism isn’t surprising considering the state of pop psychology in the early 20th century, butPersonabrings up this revelation only to drop it a few moments later for one of its many disparate narratives about personality testing.

Overall, Personais a documentary that brings up a handful of interesting points about the history and implementation of personality testing without reaching any satisfying conclusions about the practice. Some of that lack comes from the actual state of personality testing in society — no formal legislation to ban their use in hiring has passed — but simply pointing out that taking these tests seriously is weird and bad seems like a given that could have been explored in a shorter format.

If awareness that these tests have an adverse effect on hiring and have the potential to get much worse is the goal of Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests, then this film is technically a success. It certainly made me think differently about that ice cream job — would I have been predisposed to hate it because of my personality? Was I naturally better suited to making quizzes? Probably not, and it shouldn’t have mattered. As an ex-quizmaster, never trust a quizmaster.

Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Testsis now streaming on HBO Max.

Related Video: What to binge on the best 30-day free trials

0.2125s , 10026.796875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary】HBO Max's 'Persona' shows personality quiz dystopia,Data News Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产又猛又黄又爽在线视频无 | 欧美韩日二三在 | 99热精品福利在线观看 | 手机看片国产欧美日韩 | 最新一区二区三区免费看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区日产 | 亚洲欧美香蕉在线日韩精选 | 天天搞夜夜 | 神马光棍 | 久精品国产欧美亚洲色aⅴ大片 | 国产精品日韩欧美一区二区三 | 国产精品亚洲社区在线观看 | 免费人成激情视频在线观看冫 | 涩涩视频午夜福利一区二区 | 日韩一区在线观看免费观看免费 | 天天一区 | 国产福利在线网址成人 | 亚洲第一天堂m | 日韩欧美一区 | 国产su| 国产91精品高清一区二区三区 | 精品国产制服丝袜高跟 | 日韩精品一区二区三区大桥未 | 久热在线精品视频观看 | 亚洲第二页 | 亚洲综合色区另类aⅴ | 欧美乱妇高清无乱码在线观看 | 日韩在线观看高清视频 | 色老头一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美综合在线制服 | 欧美日韩视频在线观看第一区 | 亚洲欧美日韩ⅴ在线观看91 | 欧美精品一区二区三区中文 | 人成a大片在线观看 | 国产成自拍亚洲精品 | 欧美在线成人怡红院 | 国产免费大片 | 中文字幕不卡 | 性满足bbwbbwbbw| 日韩一区在线观看免费观看免费 | 国产香蕉视 |